Are All Male Feminists Sex Predators, Paedophiles, and Rapists?

Are all male feminists sex predators, paedophiles, and rapists?  I’m beginning to think, at the very least, that any self-identified ‘male feminist’, and certainly those who make a career out of that identity, should be placed on some kind of FBI watch list.

Hugo Schwyzer is the latest mangina to be exposed as someone unable to keep it in his pants – at least when vulnerable pussy is there for a beta male penis to take advantage of.  Having sex with your students would normally count as a perk of the job in my anti-feminist eyes, but when the man doing the boning has bought into the sexual trade union ideology of ‘power structures rendering consent impossible’, and such crap, then it does mean your actions are effectively those of a self-confessed rapist.

david futrelle mangina
David Futrelle

As part of his role as a full-time mangina, Hugo had also been enthusiastically organising young females into taking part in ‘slut walks’.  Another ‘perk of the job’, I guess.  This is eerily reminiscent of another leading male feminist – David Futrelle –  and his use of blogging as a thinly disguised means to arrange ‘meet-ups’ with his female readers, some of whom are clearly vulnerable, mentally disturbed, or even children.  This is a guy who has described a grown man’s fantasy of sexually assaulting a boy as ‘tender and erotic’ and who spent much of his early career as a radical statutory rape apologist and child abuse denier.  It also brings to mind infamous blogger Kyle Payne, who used his identity as a prominant male feminist to land a role as a student counsellor – and to subsequently film himself violating one of his passed out teenage charges when he was still unable to get laid.  The fervent anti-porn activist is now back in prison for fapping off to child pornography whilst on probation.

It’s long been known suspected in the men’s rights community that male feminism is simply an omega male mating strategy for the sexually frustrated.  Add to that the obvious deep-rooted psychological issues that these self-hating, white, middle-class nerds clearly possess, and you have a roll call of tragedies just waiting to play themselves out.

Exile in Gal-Ville : How a Male Feminist Alienated his Supporters

Hugo Schwyzer is Still Doing Harm

After the Lies, Feminists Continue War on Prostitution

The recent admission, in the form of a study that established that the supposed link between sex trafficking and sporting events is unfounded (a study which the sexual trade union themselves commissioned), will have little or no influence on the war on prostitution itself.  There is no question of some of the lying feminists who made such outrageous and completely baseless claims being prosecuted.  Feminists might be a little more restrained in future, but sex trafficking lies will still be at the forefront of their campaigns to criminalize the paying for sex.

Last week, the Israeli parliament passed a draft law which will criminalize men who visit prostitutes, allowing for penalties of up to 6 months in jail for repeat offenders.

http://972mag.com/knesset-passes-draft-law-to-criminalize-paying-for-se/36182/

Meanwhile, leading members of the sexual trade union have been having their voices prominently heard in the editorial section of the New York Times :

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/26/opinion/to-end-prostitution-start-with-the-demand-side.html

For too long, prostitution laws have been enforced in a gender-discriminatory manner. Those being sold and arrested are overwhelmingly women and girls. Those who buy the prostituted, or sell them, are overwhelmingly male, and face far fewer, if any, legal consequences for their actions.

If we are to stand a chance at ending sex trafficking, we must deepen our understanding of the end point of sex trafficking, which is prostitution. Those of us who reject the notion that prostitution is sex work (when did human sexuality become work anyway?) and see it as an end result of some of the worst social conditions possible (sexual abuse in childhood, poverty, gender inequality, racism) must fashion remedies that address those conditions.

Rather than make social injustice more tolerable, we must work to end it — in our lifetime and forever.

NORMA RAMOS
Executive Director, Coalition Against Trafficking in Women
New York, Feb. 14, 2012

 

Isn’t it a co-incidence that all of the ugly feminists who are so opposed to sex trafficking, and who are fervently demanding laws around the world that end sex trafficking, also happen to be virulently opposed to the morality of prostitution in itself?  It couldn’t be, could it, given the now well documented and even self-admitted fact that these feminists repeatedly lie and exaggerate claims over sex trafficking, that sex trafficking itself is just a tool to end prostitution itself – a trade which just so happens to weaken the sexual power of those aging feminists and their massive female support base?

And here’s an almost identical letter published under the above one, this time by a Pamela Shifman :

That other crimes recede but prostitution persists is no surprise to those who work on sex trafficking.

Focusing on demand is the right approach and needs to be tried for more than two days, as it was in New York City recently, before judging its efficacy.

And this must be accompanied by an explicit policy that treats those who sell as sex as victims of crime and not criminals

Those of us who have met with women and children in prostitution — from India to New York City — know that these women and children are far from criminals. They are often the most marginalized, vulnerable people in our society. They are in prostitution not because of choice, but because of lack of choice.

The reason countries like Sweden have successfully reduced prostitution is that they have recognized that those who buy sex should be held accountable, and those who sell sex should be treated as victims of violence and given the services (education, mental and physical health services, drug and alcohol treatment, and job training) that any victims need and deserve.

PAMELA SHIFMAN
Director, Initiatives for Girls and Women, NoVo Foundation
New York, Feb. 14, 2012

 

This forced victimisation of prostitutes is a feminist stock in trade and is so contrary to the findings of recent studies that there is surely sufficient grounds for prosecuting these sexual trade union criminals. But instead, they are still in a position to influence legislation and harm both sex workers and the men who pay for sex – not just in the USA, but globally, as any lobby group claiming to speak for women or children has almost omnipotent power at the utterly corrupt United Nations.

The forced victimisation by feminists of ‘whores’ – women who offer sex so cheaply that the price of the average woman is brought down – is not only nothing new, it has been going on for centuries.  For an example of this, take a look at the following ‘letter from a prostitute that didn’t want saving‘, written in 1858 and re-printed in full at the excellent blog of the sex trafficking myth buster Laura Agustin (short excerpts re-printed below) :

Like ‘One more unfortunate’ there are other intruders among us—a few, very few, ‘victims of seduction’. But seduction is not the root of the evil—scarcely a fibre of the root. A rigorous law should be passed and rigorously carried out to punish seduction, but it will not perceptibly thin the ranks of prostitution. Seduction is the common story of numbers of well brought up, who never were seduced, and who are voluntary and inexcusable profligates. Vanity and idleness send us a large body of recruits. Servant girls, who wish to ape their mistress’ finery, and whose wages won’t permit them to do so honestly—these set up seduction as their excuse. Married women, who have no respect for their husbands, and are not content with their lawful earnings, these are the worst among us, and it is a pity they cannot be picked out and punished. They have no principle of any kind and are a disgrace to us. If I were a married woman I would be true to my husband. I speak for my class, the regular standing army of the force.

 

It’s also interesting to note that a common complaint of English prostitutes of the mid 19th century was the growing number of foreign women in their ranks – who, no doubt, were ‘undercutting’ the native sex workers :

‘One more unfortunate’ proposes a ‘skimming’ progress. But what of the great bubbling cauldron? Remove from the streets a score or two of ‘foreign women’, and ‘double as many English’, and you diminish the competition of those that remain; the quiet, clever, cunning cajolers described by ‘One more unfortunate’. You hide a prurient pimple of the ‘great sin’ with a patch of that plaster known as the ‘observance of propriety’, and nothing more. You ‘miss’ the evil, but it is existent still. After all it is something to save the eye from offence, so remove them; and not only a score or two, but something like two hundred foreign women, whose open and disgusting indecen­cies and practices have contributed more than anything else to bring on our heads the present storm of indignation. It is rare that English women, even prostitutes, give cause of gross public offence. Cannot they be packed off to their own countries with their base, filthy and filthy- living men, whom they maintain, and clothe, and feed, to superintend their fortunes, and who are a still greater disgrace to London than these women are?

 

Sadly, this is nothing new either.  Sex workers in South Korea recently began organising themselves into a union in the face of increasing lobbying from western NOGs to criminalize prostitution (or the paying for sex) in that country too.  But the sex worker’s union also quickly found the time to complain about foreign sex workers, and has actively started to lobby the South Korean government to crack down on foreign sex workers from the likes of Vietnam, who offer punters cheaper (and no doubt more exotic) services than the natives.

Whether they are prostitutes, or middle-aged women lobbying to put an end to prostitution, women are much the same – always fighting to preserve their highest possible asking price in the sexual market.

Canadian Father Tells Slut Walker to ‘Sit Her Whore Ass Down’ On Vancouver Skytrain

Hahahaha!  As readers of this blog will know, I’m not against ‘sluts’, and certainly not when they are nubile and good looking. But the father in this video was well within his rights to tell this deluded ugly bitch, who was ‘pole dancing’ with her ass cheeks showing in front of his child on the train, to ‘sit her whore ass down’.

Feminist’s Own Study Shows No Link Between Sports Events and Sex Trafficking

http://www.trust.org/trustlaw/news/link-between-sports-events-sex-trafficking-unfounded-study

A widespread belief that major sporting events fuel sex trafficking is unsubstantiated and has a negative impact on groups that campaigners purport to protect, undermining anti-trafficking objectives, a new study has said.

Activists opposed to sex work say large groups of men attending the Olympics, FIFA World Cup and U.S. Super Bowl competitions create a high demand for sex work causing large numbers of women to be trafficked, the report produced by the Global Alliance Against Traffic in Women (GAATW) said.

Yet there is no correlation between those beliefs and the actual number of trafficking cases found, the report titled “What’s the Cost of a Rumour?” said, citing such examples as the 2010 FIFA World Cup in South Africa, the 2004 Olympics in Greece and several Super Bowl competitions.

Translation : ‘Even the mainstream media are waking up to the truth behind our sex trafficking bullshit stories – we need to start being a little bit more subtle in our myth making, otherwise the entire sexual trade union project may be undermined.’

Anti-trafficking campaigns that are based on unproven claims can ultimately undermine anti-trafficking objectives, the report said.

Such claims can cause damage by resulting in increased criminal penalties and human rights violations against sex workers, by misrepresenting people and issues, through city “clean-up” efforts displacing sex workers and other marginalised groups, it said.

Of course, increase criminal penalties and human rights violations against the disposable male who pays for sex doesn’t even warrant a mention.

Germany Urged to End Sex Offender Castration

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-17124604

Europe’s top human rights watchdog, the Council of Europe, has urged Germany to end the practice of surgically castrating sex offenders.

The council’s anti-torture committee said such voluntary treatment, albeit rare in Germany, was “degrading”.

In Germany no more than five sex offenders a year have been opting for castration, hoping it will lower their sex drives and reduce their jail term.

The committee’s recommendations are not binding but have great influence.

The committee’s official title is the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT).

“Surgical castration is a mutilating, irreversible intervention and cannot be considered as a medical necessity in the context of the treatment of sexual offenders”, the CPT report said. It was based on an investigation in Germany carried out in November-December 2010.

The BBC’s Stephen Evans in Berlin says the German authorities argue that castration is not a punishment but a treatment which enables, as a government statement put it, “suffering tied to an abnormal sex drive… to be cured, or at least alleviated”.

I have somewhat mixed feelings about this.  So the ‘top European human rights body’ seems to have no problem with middle-aged feminists criminalising male sexuality in ever more extensive and draconian ways….and yet get on their moral high horse when ‘sex offenders’ are given the opportunity of removing the source of their suffering (i.e. having a dick)!

Update : Just noticed that Human-Stupidity had already posted this story

Amazing Atheist on the Moral Cowards of ‘Morality in Media’

Follow up video to Porn on a Plane :

A loyal reader has also informed us of the following excellent rebuttal of Morality in Media :

Morality in Media Admits They Lack Facts, So They Lie About Porn

UPDATE – Top comment on the Morality in Media re-direction video (17 upvotes in 26 minutes) :

Do you hate porn because the women in it are hot and very desirable, and you are a horrible, ugly girl, inside and out?

Note also that PornHarms.com appears to have been completely taken off their webhost’s servers.

‘Morality in Media’ Recording Your IP Address and ‘Illegal Access’ to their Site!!

Underneath his video response to a ‘Morality in Media’ woman’s hysterical attack on a man she ‘caught’ watching Asian porn on a plane, the Amazing Atheist left the contact page link for that organisation.  If you visit that page now, you see the following:

porn harms redirect

Underneath those two sentences is a third stating that your IP address has been recorded, together with your IP address (although they showed mine incorrectly).  You are then re-directed to another of their videos, and another of their hags explaining why pornography is evil (a video that has now over 1,400 downvotes and less than 100 upvotes).

This is the arrogance of the psychotic individuals who make up the myriad lobby groups of the sexual trade union.  They want half of the people on this planet to live in a world where any criticism of them, or of their laws on or attitudes to porn, leads you to fear having your door broken in by the FBI at 4 in the morning.  And the reality is that their influence is such that they will probably have that power very soon, unless they are stopped right now or in the very near future.

The clock is ticking, time is running out.  Do something now by e-mailing your thoughts to :

grassroots@pornharms.com (this is the sister site to Morality in Media)

Please be restrained and try to be reasonably civil, even though these people would have you raped and beaten in prison for simply questioning their assertion that porn is inherently evil.

Please E-mail PornHarms.com over ‘Porn on a Plane’ and their Demonisation of Male Sexuality

This is my e-mail to grassroots@pornharms.com over the video  – ‘Man watched violent, child-themed porn on Delta flight – NO ONE CARED‘, which was brilliantly and scathingly torn apart by the Amazing Atheist.  Please e-mail her (Dawn Hawkins) your own thoughts about her video, then paste your e-mail in a comment underneath this article.

Hi,

I watched your YouTube video this morning, entitled ‘Man watched violent, child-themed porn on Delta flight – NO ONE CARED!’

You said that you wanted viewers to contact you with their thoughts…so here I am.

At first I was sickened by your racist, misandristic video, but then I collected myself and realised that, really, I ought to just pity you.  I don’t mean to be cruel – but you’re obviously tormented by your bitterness at being plain and unattractive.  You really need some professional help in order to overcome your transparent sexual jealousy of younger women, and in particular, of Asian females.

You appear to be simply rationalising your own sexual insecurities in order to demonise and criminalise men, and in order to limit the sexual power of females younger and better looking than yourself.  Please stop it – you’re hurting men, and you are restricting the freedoms of thousands of young women and girls around the world.  Seek help, and you might become a better person, able to live with yourself, instead of hating yourself and the world around you.

Perhaps you should take a lesson from your admission that ‘NO ONE CARED’.  That’s right – nobody cares except bitter, unattractive, and aging women, who think they can rig the free sexual market in their own favour by shaming men and introducing law after law that criminilises male sexuality or restricts people’s freedoms. In my opinion, this is the equivalent of rape – on a massive scale. Your only hope of success in this is by your manipulative out of sight lobbying of governments, something that tramples upon democracy, the principle of rational and open debate, and the rights to freedom of expression and sexual self-determination for thousands or millions of people around the world.

Please…you’re degrading yourself and other women like you.  Once again, I urge you to accept your limitations and to seek professional counselling.

Here are some links that you may find helpful :

http://www2.hu-berlin.de/sexology/BIB/DIAM/effects_pornography.htm#conclusions (leading independent study concludes that porn is harmless)

http://www.thetherapylounge.com/hypnotherapy/overcome-jealousy  (psychotherapy for women suffering from excessive sexual jealousy)

http://www.lef.org/magazine/mag2010/jun2010_Immortal-Stem-Cells-for-Anti-Aging-Therapies_01.htm (in a couple of decades you might be able to look 18 years old again!)

http://timeguide.wordpress.com/2012/02/23/avatar-0-0/ (Leading futurologist claims that, in a couple of decades, people will be having sex through avatars, or wearing lenses that allow them to alter the look of their lover.  Even without stem cell rejuvenation or surgery, you will be able to look like a beautiful 18 year old Asian girl!  The laws that you are trying to introduce now are very short-sighted.  You are a loser in the free sexual market today, but in 20 years time there will be no winners or losers, and you won’t have any reason to be sexually jealous or bitter anymore.  Please seek therapy, and try to take a longer term view of your sex life.)

 Yours sincerely

Arthur Schopenbecq