I was on vacation for most of August and then had the problem of being hacked to deal with upon my return, so there’s not been much activity here of late. I’ve finally gotten around to equipping myself with a smartphone recently, and now that I can operate the nifty wordpress application on it, I should be better able to update on my trips abroad in future, as well as moderating comments and generally keeping in touch with the latest men’s rights headlines myself on a day to day basis, both home and away.
Tommorrow I’ll post a round-up of some of the stories that did manage to catch my eye whilst I was away, but first I’ll devote an entire belated post to the London riots, which likely affected me personally more than anyone else in the manosphere.
There are two obvious things regarding the cause of the riots that I want to briefly state and which, of course, will hardly have been discussed or even admitted anywhere else.
The first is that this was predominantly an outbreak of black lawlessness and violence. Now of course, this is a sensitive subject to broach, and although I don’t mind offending the politically correct progressive frauds, I hesitate to alienate any of my readers who agree with so much of what I write on other topics. I’ll therefore try to be sensitive in what I’m about to say. There is a problem with violence and lawlessness amongst many young black males, and of course, not just in the UK. So far as it has been addressed by the media, predictably, the blame has been put upon ‘absent fathers’. Once again we have the doublethink belief that the role of the father is worthless and insignificant when it comes to custody award decisions, and yet simultaneously absent fathers can be blamed entirely for the breakdown of law and order and the rise of a ferral anarchic generation.
Lacking a male parental role-model is no doubt a significant factor in the problems of the black community, and a leading cause of youth crime in general, but the problem would not be so great if male role-models were present elsewhere in a young male’s life. Sadly, largely because of paedohysteria, they are not. But not only does paedohysteria result in a damaging lack of male role-models, the lack of male authority figures, as well as the demonisation of all adult males – particularly white adult males – as potential paedophiles, means that this is the first generation in history to actually be taught to hate their elders, or rather their male elders. Whereas all previous generations of virtually every society in history where taught to respect those older than themselves as a source of both wisdom and authority, we are actually the first civilisation to teach our children to essentially fear all adult males as possible child molestors and to actively restrict and deter interaction between the generations. The result this month was that the London riots were not just black riots, they were practically the first ‘children’s riots’ in history – with some of those arrested being as young as 11.
Incredibly, this feminist crime of generational apartheid, committted primarily in order to protect their aging and unwanted vaginas, has been wholeheartedly embraced not only by the left, but by the right as well – even by, and maybe even particularly by, white male conservatives. You could call it the great 21st century anglo-american conservative project – to raise the first generation in history to fear and loathe their elders. Well good luck with that project. To be honest, I’d like to beat your retarded ‘conservative’ brains out with a nail studded baseball bat, but in the name of civility, I wish you good luck with that. You’re going to f******* need it as you quite literally watch civilisation burn – vainly trying to protect the medieval economic value you imagine your teenage princesses’ virginity brings (face it, the average 16 year old American girl has probably already taken more than one afro-american dick up her ass, and will continue to do so even if you allow the feminists who have co-opted you to send every ‘pedo’ predator to the incinerator).
Secondly, a cause at least as great as absent fathers in the problem of young black male violence is the role that female teenage sexuality plays. The gap between black and white boys in education is not very significant until the onset of puberty. From that point on, the academic performance of teenage black boys declines rapidly and many fall prey to gang culture and the attitude that study and education is unmasculine, twinned with a need to win ‘respect’ through violence. From where does this culture arise? From the pussies of white teenage girls, who salivate at the racist stereotype of the black male being violent, savage, and barely human. In fact, if women loved porn as much as men did, just as the most popular category for men is the ‘barely legal’ teen niche, the most popular for (white) women would be a ‘barely human’ category. And, by the way, don’t mistake what I’m saying here for racism. I’m merely describing the overt sexual racial stereotyping of black men by many or most young white women, something that does terrible damage to the black male community, and is as big a factor in the cause of black male violence as any other.
But of course, in today’s culturally marxist society, in which free speech has been steadily eroded by the ‘liberal progressive’ elite, it’s not even possible for society at large (in other words white people) to discuss problems with black culture at all, as the historian David Starkey found to his cost recently, let alone questions of race and iq. Personally, I doubt if the difference in IQ between black and white people is inherent, but I do wonder if one of the primary motivations behind the near criminilisation of any serioius discussion as to the possiblity that that could be the case comes from the selfish sexual motivations of feminists and their female electorate. It is often assumed that second wave feminism followed on from the black civil rights movement. I rather suspect that, just as feminists ‘gave’ homosexuals their rights through largely self-interested reasons, white women played a far greater part in granting black people their rights than has been acknowledged – for similarly selfish sexual reasons. And I do believe that it is quite possible that the current medieval witchhunt against any scientific investigation into possible genetic racial differences is due to the fact that feminists want to forbid any possible ethical objections to interracial sex – to white female access to black meat. So far as such tests are significant, and for whatever the reason (genetic or environmental) the disparity in IQ and ‘mental age’ between a black man and middle-class white women is probably as great as that between a white European male and a 13 year old South East Asian female. The average IQ of one of the many thousands of wealthy white women who flock to the carribean each year to molest the ‘big bamboos’ of the local rastifarians is probably in the range of 110 – 130. Yet the average IQ of the ‘big bamboos’ is likely less than 70. The difference in mental age in such relationships, quite besides the issues of prostitution and poverty, is probably greater than that between a white adult male and an intelligent 11 year old girl. Yet the feminist media increasingly portrays even mentally retarded teenage boys as paedophile monsters when they have sex with other teenage girls. Little wonder then that feminists ensure that cultural marxism continues to forbid any rational discussion on race and IQ.
For another men’s rights perspective on the causes of the London riots see also ManWomanMyth’s excellent article :
The great Steve Moxon (author of the essential ‘The Woman Racket’ – see sidebar) doesn’t update his blog very often but he posted a couple of interesting and controversial articles on the riots : http://stevemoxon.blogspot.com/2011/08/underclass-my-foot-riots-essentially.html